Of Aliens and Astrotheology: Some Musings

J. Neil Daniels 

Introduction

The possibility of extraterrestrial life, long the domain of science fiction, has garnered serious attention in both scientific and theological circles. This subject raises fundamental questions about the uniqueness of life on Earth, the nature of the cosmos, and the theological implications of potential non-human intelligences. While empirical inquiry attempts to calculate the probability of alien civilizations, theology probes deeper issues regarding divine purpose, the scope of redemption, and the anthropocentric nature of Scripture. This essay will explore the scientific hypotheses concerning extraterrestrial life, highlight the varying estimations regarding intelligent life in the universe, and examine the theological implications for Christian thought, especially in light of the emerging field of astrotheology.

Scientific Frameworks: The Drake Equation and the SETI Endeavor

The scientific investigation into extraterrestrial life frequently begins with the Drake Equation, a probabilistic framework developed by Frank Drake in the 1960s. The equation, N = R ⋅ fp ⋅ ne ⋅ fl ⋅ fi ⋅ fc ⋅ L*, attempts to estimate the number of technologically communicative civilizations in the Milky Way. It accounts for factors such as star formation rates, planetary systems, habitability, biological emergence, the development of intelligence and technology, and the longevity of such civilizations. While the equation is useful for generating discussion, its parameters are mostly speculative and difficult to quantify with precision.¹

Despite these uncertainties, some scholars have suggested that the likelihood of extraterrestrial life is high. Philosopher Paul Churchland, for example, estimated that intelligent life could exist on as many as one million planets within our galaxy.² However, as the equation’s later factors suggest, the existence of intelligent life does not imply that contact with such beings is feasible. The difficulties of spatial scatter (the sheer distances involved), temporal scatter (the asynchronous development of civilizations), and biological divergence (the possibility that alien life is utterly unlike us) severely reduce the likelihood of successful contact.

Nonetheless, enthusiasm persists. In 1985, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) was established to systematically investigate potential signals from intelligent life forms. SETI combines radio telescopes, signal processing, and astrobiological research to monitor cosmic phenomena for signs of intelligent origin. Although the project has yet to identify definitive evidence of alien civilizations, it remains a symbol of humanity’s desire to connect beyond Earth.

Rare Earth Hypothesis and Scientific Dissent

Against the optimism of SETI and related efforts stands the rare earth hypothesis, advanced notably by Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee. In their book Rare Earth: Why Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe, they argue that while microbial life may be relatively common, the emergence of complex, sentient organisms is exceedingly rare.³ They emphasize the delicate balance of conditions required for life on Earth—such as planetary position, stable climate, protective magnetic field, and the presence of a large moon—and suggest that these are statistically improbable elsewhere in the universe. Their thesis challenges the presumption that intelligent life is ubiquitous, cautioning against extrapolating from a single data point—Earth—to the entirety of the cosmos.

Historical and Philosophical Background

Historical attitudes toward extraterrestrial life have varied widely. While early Christian theologians were largely silent on the matter, the medieval period brought divergent views. Thomas Aquinas was skeptical, believing such life might disrupt the unity of creation.⁴ Nicholas of Cusa, however, speculated that God may have populated the cosmos with various life-forms.⁵ The Renaissance figure Giordano Bruno was martyred in part, it seems, for his cosmic pluralism.⁶ In the Enlightenment, Thomas Paine attempted to discredit Christianity by arguing that belief in multiple worlds undermines the uniqueness of Christ’s redemptive work.⁷ By contrast, C. S. Lewis explored the theological viability of extraterrestrial life through imaginative fiction, envisioning unfallen alien species within a Christian cosmos.⁸

Theological Reflections: Anthropic Centrality and Divine Creativity

The theological implications of extraterrestrial life are profound and contested. Some theologians resist the idea of ETs, arguing that the Bible presents a distinctly anthropocentric view of creation. Since Scripture portrays humans as the crown of creation (Psalm 8; Genesis 1:26–28), it is often assumed that life elsewhere would either compete with or undermine this central role.

However, as Gerald Bray astutely observes, the Bible’s silence on extraterrestrial life does not constitute a denial of its possibility.⁹ The biblical authors wrote within a terrestrial context, addressing the history of redemption as it relates to humankind. The absence of a reference to aliens is no more telling than the absence of a reference to the Americas. Bray further notes that an overinvestment of resources into speculative science yields little practical or theological benefit. Nonetheless, he warns against dismissing the matter solely on scriptural silence, advocating a cautious agnosticism.

The New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics adds that Scripture, while earth-oriented, does not deny the existence of non-human life-forms. Given the angelic hosts, it is entirely plausible that other rational beings could exist.¹⁰ The discovery of such beings would not, in itself, challenge the gospel, but would prompt theologians and apologists to reflect on issues such as general and special revelation, and the scope of redemption.¹¹

Astrotheology: Creation, Anthropology, Incarnation, and Redemption

Astrotheology and its kindred disciplines—exotheology and cosmotheology—attempt to engage these questions with doctrinal integrity.¹² With regard to creation, extraterrestrial life would magnify God’s creative diversity.¹³ According to Colossians 1:15–17, all things—whether visible or invisible, on earth or in the heavens—were made through and for Christ. Thus, any rational extraterrestrial beings would still be contingent upon and accountable to the Creator (Heb. 4:13).¹⁴

Anthropology raises another issue. Scripture regards humans as uniquely made in God’s image, yet fallen (Gen. 1:26–31; 3:6–7; Rom. 3:9–18). If other intelligent beings exist, we must ask whether they, too, are fallen and in need of redemption.¹⁵ While speculative, the idea does not necessarily diminish human dignity or divine favor toward humanity.¹⁶

Incarnation and redemption present the most difficult theological challenge. The Son of God became incarnate as a man in order to redeem human beings (John 1:14; 1 John 4:10; Heb. 2:14–18). If other races required redemption, would the eternal Son need to become incarnate in their likeness as well? While Hebrews 9 affirms the once-for-all nature of Christ’s death, some theologians believe it is plausible that this singular event could have cosmic application (Col. 1:20). Others suggest that redemption might require a distinct incarnation for each fallen race.¹⁷ In any case, Christians should be cautious about speculations that relativize Christ’s unique work, while affirming that all redemption, if it exists, must proceed through the eternal Logos.¹⁸

The Resilience of Christian Theology

History demonstrates that the Christian faith can adapt to new discoveries without forfeiting its doctrinal core. The early church wrestled with Gentile inclusion (Acts 11), the Copernican revolution forced a reevaluation of geocentrism, and geological evidence of an ancient earth led to renewed biblical interpretation.¹⁹ Likewise, the theological framework surrounding extraterrestrial life, though speculative, is not beyond the reach of biblical orthodoxy. Christians who explore these questions must do so seriously, reverently, and with Christ at the center (Rom. 11:36).²⁰

Conclusion

The subject of extraterrestrial life presents a remarkable intersection of scientific inquiry and theological reflection. While empirical evidence for intelligent extraterrestrial life remains lacking, the theoretical frameworks used to assess its probability, such as the Drake Equation and the SETI initiative, continue to generate public and scholarly interest. Meanwhile, theologians are increasingly engaging with the implications of such possibilities, navigating between anthropocentrism and cosmic inclusivity.

Though speculative in many respects, this discourse offers an occasion for Christian theology to reaffirm central doctrines—the uniqueness of Christ, the image of God in humanity, and the sovereignty of God over all creation—while remaining open to the grandeur and mystery of the universe He has made. As with many areas at the borderlands of science and theology, humility, curiosity, and doctrinal fidelity must walk hand in hand.

---

Endnotes

1. Frank Drake, “Project Ozma,” Physics Today 14, no. 4 (1961): 40–46.
2. Paul Churchland, Matter and Consciousness, rev. ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988), 170.
3. Peter D. Ward and Donald Brownlee, Rare Earth: Why Complex Life Is Uncommon in the Universe (New York: Copernicus, 2000).
4. New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics, s.v. “Extra-Terrestrial Life.”
5. Ibid.
6. Ibid.
7. Ibid.
8. C. S. Lewis, The Space Trilogy (New York: HarperCollins, 2013).
9. Gerald Bray, God Is Love: A Biblical and Systematic Theology (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2012), epub eBook, locations 544, 547.
10. New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics, s.v. “Extra-Terrestrial Life.”
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. Ibid.; see also Col. 1:15–17; Amos 5:8.
14. Heb. 4:13.
15. Gen. 1:26–31; 3:6–7; Rom. 3:9–18.
16. New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics, s.v. “Extra-Terrestrial Life.”
17. Heb. 9:12, 26, 28; Col. 1:15–20.
18. Ibid.; cf. Gal. 4:4–5; Heb. 2:14–18.
19. Ibid.; see Acts 11:1–18; Ps. 8:3–4; 2 Tim. 2:15.
20. Rom. 11:36.