Rejecting Kleptoeulogianism

-

On Rejecting Kleptoeulogianism


On X (formerly Twitter), Matt Ferris (@ferrismattic) introduces the term κλεπτοευλογία—from klepto (to steal) and eulogia (blessing)—to describe the misappropriation of blessings intended for all believers. When access to spiritual gifts, identity in Christ, or priestly standing is reserved for a select few, we risk denying what Scripture freely gives. Every Christian is a saint (1 Cor 1:2), part of a royal priesthood (1 Pet 2:9), and indwelt by the Spirit (Rom 8:9). Restricting these to an exclusive class is not piety; it is kleptoeulogia.

This critique recalls the Reformers’ rejection of clerical privilege and their recovery of the priesthood of all believers. While the New Testament affirms distinct offices for shepherding and teaching (Eph 4:11; 1 Tim 3:1–7), it never grants monopoly over divine grace. Faithful ecclesiology affirms spiritual equality and ordered ministry without collapsing one into the other. Ferris’s coinage is timely. The church must resist spiritual gatekeeping and ensure that every member of Christ’s body partakes fully in the blessings of the new covenant. As Ferris' rightfully encourages, we must reject kleptoeulogianism.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oneness Pentecostalism: A Critical Examination of Contemporary Modalism

-
Image
Oneness Pentecostalism: A Critique of Contemporary Modalism J. Neil Daniels  Introduction Oneness Pentecostalism—commonly referred to as the "Jesus Only" movement—constitutes a pronounced departure from the doctrinal foundations of historic Christianity. Arising between 1913 and 1916 within the Assemblies of God, the movement diverged sharply from classical Pentecostalism by repudiating Trinitarian theology in favor of a novel reinterpretation of the divine nature. Though birthed within a revivalist milieu, it has since developed into a distinct and theologically aberrant movement, encompassing several major denominations such as the United Pentecostal Church International, Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, and others, collectively claiming an estimated four million adherents worldwide. Institutionally, Oneness Pentecostalism has established a robust infrastructure, including a denominational publishing arm (Word of Flame Press), educational institutions, socia...
Read more

The Catholic Church's Doctrine of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus: Rome’s Shifting Claims on Salvation and the Church

-
The Catholic Church's Doctrine of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus : Rome’s Shifting Claims on Salvation and the Church J. Neil Daniels Nota Bene : An audio overview is available here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IapKP-ehgPvp-oZCZQlVPvoq8nahP00z/view?usp=drivesdk Introduction The Catholic Church’s doctrine of Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (“Outside the Church, there is no salvation”) historically stood as a resolute declaration that salvation is exclusively through explicit membership in the Roman Catholic Church and submission to the Roman Pontiff. Grounded in centuries of papal bulls, conciliar decrees, and anathemas, this teaching was articulated with juridical precision and enforced through infallible pronouncements, admitting neither ambiguity nor exception. However, the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965) radically redefined this doctrine, introducing “invincible ignorance” and an inclusivist framework that extends salvation to non-Catholics, including Protestants, Muslims, and...
Read more

The Pierced Messiah: A Grammatical and Theological Analysis of Zechariah 12:10

-
The Pierced Messiah: A Grammatical and Theological Analysis of Zechariah 12:10 J. Neil Daniels Nota Bene: A "Deep Dive" audio overview is available here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TSolSl1N_eN1uWVbJFvmzMbAhOHsamS2/view?usp=drivesdk Introduction The messianic interpretation of Zechariah 12:10 has been a subject of intense scholarly debate for centuries. The verse reads: "And they will look at Me whom they pierced. They will mourn for Him as one mourns for an only child and weep bitterly for Him as one weeps for a firstborn" (HCSB). This passage presents significant interpretive challenges, particularly regarding the identity of the "pierced one" and the implications for messianic prophecy. While early rabbis and Christian expositors traditionally interpreted this text as messianic, many contemporary scholars have rejected this interpretation, preferring to identify the pierced figure with slain Israelites or Jewish martyrs.¹ The crux of the interpreti...
Read more